I always associate Hal Hartley and Atom Egoyan together, although they are very different filmmakers, mainly because I discovered them both around the same time. They were two intelligent, talented independent filmmakers with unique visions and whose films inspired definitive moods. Unfortunately, if that makes any sense, Egoyan was "discovered" and handed bigger budgets (and constraints) than Hartley ever has. There are definitely very well-known actors who appear in Hartley films, such as Isabelle in Huppert in Amateur or Sarah Polley, Helen Mirren, and Julie Christie in No Such Thing, they are clearly sacrificing a ton of salary as a labor of love so that they could work with him. Egoyan was eventually plucked from his small films focusing on the Armenian experience or the dehumanizing influence of technology and was given resources (and limitations) that Hartley could never dream of. Sometimes it works, such as his extraordinary The Sweet Hereafter (which I'll happily get the opportunity to re-watch again as is it featured in the Atom Egoyan collection this month on the Criterion Channel). At other times, it simply didn't. This morning I gave another look at his 2009 film Chloe, which starred Julianne Moore, Amanda Seyfried, and Liam Neeson. All of them give very fine performances, especially Moore, although even on a first viewing I didn't think the whole added up to the merits of its parts. I mention first viewing because shortly after watching it for the first time I found out that it was a remake of a French film, Anne Fontaine's 2003 film Nathalie..., which starred Fanny Ardant, Emmanuelle Beart, and Gerard Depardieu. The original is not a great film, but certainly better than Egoyan's remake. Essentially, I just don't understand why he made Chloe in the first place. Obviously, artists get tired of themselves and want to try different things, and that's something they should always pursue, but this felt like someone offered him a lot of money to make an erotic thriller. So, no, I would not recommend Chloe. There are simply too many great early Atom Egoyan films that deserve greater attention.








