" . . . then marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, or four, but if you fear that you will not deal justly, then only one . . ." 4:3
Here's another line from my early morning Quranic study that jumped out at me, although I've clearly thought about it a lot over the years. It's also a line that we discussed in my various classes that dealt with Islam or the Islamic world, because it gives context to the notion of polygamy. There seems to be this perception on the part of folks who no almost nothing about Islam that all Muslims are running around with several wives, and one of the reasons why is that Muhammad gave them this privilege and encouraged them to do so. The reality is that a very small percentage of the 1.7 billion Muslims in the world actually have more than one wife. It's hard to come up with an exact figure, but it seems to be less than two percent. This revelation, from Allah through Gabriel to Muhammad, did not increase the number of wives, but instead limited it. What jumped out at me this morning was the balancing act between the transitory and the eternal, between the particular and the universal. Polygamy is an ancient practice, and it was especially prevalent in pre-Islamic Arabia, made more common by the constant warfare of that period. Essentially, there were a lot of widows, and one way that you took care of so many widows was for men of certain wealth to marry them. There are other things going on in regards to polygamy, obviously, but the number of "extra" widows was a driving force in the number of polygamous marriages at that particular time. Most of the Prophet's wives were widows. Anyway, while it's interesting to consider that this revelation limited the number of wives, as compared to increasing them, what inspired this post today are the words "deal justly." I'm a historian, so of course I'm going to think that time and place and context matter, even in religious texts, but even if I were not a historian I would think that time and place and context matter, even in religious texts. The number of wives represents the conditions of a particular time and place, and in some ways (most ways) I think it should stay in that time and place. One of the reasons why we study the Quran, or any religious text, is to get at the deeper meanings, which are more eternal and universal. So, if we're looking at this passage as a justification to take a second wife (in a country where that is an option), then I think we're missing the point. The key, the transcendent, eternal, universal key, is that emphasis on dealing justly with your spouse (because part of that search for the universal has to be going beyond a message told to dudes in a patriarchal society).